Important Pension Change - Act Now

Budget 2014 reduced the standard fund threshold (SFT) from €2.3m to €2m.

This means that, when an individual accesses their pension benefits, if the value of all pensions held by that individual exceeds €2m, the excess will be subject to an effective rate of tax of up to 70%! 

While a fund of €2m may seem quite large, it in fact equates to an annual income in retirement of around €50,000 so it may affect more pension savers than you would initially imagine.

In a recent survey conducted by Independent Trustee Company, 75% of the advisors polled said that   securing the €2.3m PFT for their clients was of high importance.  There is a window of opportunity available, but you must act quickly.  

Where an individual has existing benefits in excess of €2m at 1^st January 2014, Revenue will allow them to apply for a personal fund threshold (PFT) and that threshold will apply to them instead of the SFT.  The maximum PFT available is €2.3m.  Depending on your clients’ circumstances, it may therefore make sense for them to contribute to their scheme before the end of the year in order to secure a PFT for the full value of their benefits.  Contributions made after 1^st January 2014 cannot be included in the calculation of the PFT.

The key is to act now, before the 31^st December, while the opportunity for your clients is still available. 

For further information, please contact one of our consultants in ITC Consulting:

Barry Kennelly on (01) 6148068 or at barry.kennelly@independent-trustee.com

Jennie Faughnan on (01) 6035140 or at jennie.faughnan@independent-trustee.com

Finance Act 2013 - The Bill, Part 2

Following the budget in early October, the Government have wasted no time in introducing Finance Bill 2013 (2) which, among other things, makes provision for how Noonan’s pension amendments are to take effect. Paul Gilmer sets out some of the key points from the first draft of the bill:

1. New Standard Fund Threshold (SFT)

As expected, the SFT has been reduced, but by a lot less than most expected. Finance Bill 2013 (2) reduces the €2.3 million cap down to €2 million with effect from 1 January 2014. However, as on previous occasions, an individual who has pension rights in excess of this new lower SFT limit on 1 January 2014 may claim a Personal Fund Threshold from the Revenue Commissioners (see note 2).

The new lump sum rules are:

1. Maximum tax relieved lump sum at 25% of €2,000,000 = €500,000
2. The first €200,000 tax free.
3. €300,000 taxed at 20%


Individuals with the capacity to fund to the €2.3 million mark should act before the 31 December 2013.

2. New .15 Levy

Minister for Finance Michael Noonan has followed through on the Government’s commitment to end the pension levy  of 0.6 per cent a year but disappointingly didn’t waste any time in introducing a new levy of .15 per cent for the years 2014 and 2015. Unfortunately, it seems that the levy is going to be a feature on the pension landscape for the foreseeable future.


3. Revenue are introducing e-filing for the new round of Personal Fund Thresholds (PFTs):

In order to make a PFT notification to Revenue, an individual will be required to obtain from the administrator of each pension arrangement of which he or she is a member, a statement certifying, among other things, the amount of the individual’s pension rights on 1 January 2014 relating to that arrangement. A PFT notification will have to be made electronically on a system being developed by Revenue and the time period for notification will be 12 months after the date on which the electronic system is made available.

A PFT notification made by electronic means shall be deemed to include a declaration to the effect that the notification is correct and complete.

Revenue will also accept a PFT application in the normal way for those retiring before the electronic system in place.

4. Another benefit to the public sector high earners:

The reimbursement options, introduced in Finance Act 2012, for public servants affected by chargeable excess tax (who, unlike affected individuals in the private sector, cannot generally minimise or prevent the breaching of the SFT or PFT by ceasing contributions and benefit accruals) are being amended and extended.  This will reduce the amount that can be recovered upfront from the net retirement lump sum payable to the individual to a maximum of 20 per cent (from 50 per cent) and to include the option of reimbursement of the pension fund administrator solely by way of a reduction in the gross pension payable over a period not exceeding 20 years.

5. There is more detail on the new rules for valuing pension benefits:

The valuation factor to be used for establishing the capital value of an individual’s defined benefit (DB) pension rights at the point of retirement, where this takes place after 1 January 2014, is being changed from the current standard valuation factor of 20 to a higher age–related valuation factor that will vary with the individual’s age at the point at which the pension rights are drawn down. The age–related valuation factors range from 37 for DB pension rights drawn down at age 50 or under, to a factor of 22 where they are drawn down at age 70 or over.  The valuation will also distinguish between benefits accrued before 1 January 2014 (still valued at 20 times) to those accruing after 1 January 2014 (valued based on the age related factors).

6. Clarification of the early access to AVCs

The bill provides clarity for members of occupational pension schemes/PRSAs regarding the option to withdraw up to 30 per cent of the accumulated value of additional voluntary contributions. The bill is amended to address concerns that the existing override provisions in the section may not give scheme trustees and PRSA administrators sufficient scope to allow such withdrawals where the trust deed and scheme rules or the PRSA contract terms prohibit them. The amendment specifically provides that the option may be exercised by an individual, notwithstanding the rules of the retirement benefits scheme or the terms of the PRSA contract concerned. This will obviate the need for scheme rules or contract terms to be changed to facilitate the withdrawal option. The change applies to options exercised on or after 27 March 2013, the date Finance Act 2013 became law.

Of course, we are all hoping this is the end to what has become an annual event whereby amendments are made to the Irish Pension Regime. However, lessons from the levy show we should not be too optimistic.

Paul Gilmer

Director

ITC Consulting

Planning points after the Personal Fund Threshold applications. Part 3

The third common query that I want to address in this series of posts is around a guaranteed annuity rate when considering the PFT.

Where a person has a pension with a guaranteed annuity rate in excess of 5%, do you use:

a.    20 times multiplier of the guaranteed sum, or

b.    multiplier based on actual annuity rates as at 7^th December 2010?

For Defined Benefit (DB) schemes the valuation basis provided for, by the legislation, is 20 x Pension. For a Defined Contribution (DC) scheme where the insurance contract contains an entitlement on retirement at Normal Retirement Age (NRA) to a minimum guaranteed annuity rate, a number of questions arise:

1.    Does the existence of the guaranteed annuity rate convert this into a Defined Benefit scheme? In my view the answer is no.

2.    If not, should the contract still be valued using the 20 x valuation system? Again my view is no. Typically market annuity rates will give a better value.

3.    Are market rates the only way to value? No. Consideration should be given to other value options e.g. Discounted cash flow.

If you have any queries on any of the queries raised in this series of blog posts, please contact us on (01) 661 1022.

Aidan McLoughlin

Planning points after the Personal Fund Threshold applications. Part 2

Continuing on with the common queries around the Personal Fund Threshold (PFT), another key issue raised was expressed well in this example:

If a hospital consultant has worked for 20 years as at 7^th December 2010 and expects to work for a further 20 years, is the capital value of the pension

a.    pensionable salary x (20/80) x 20 or

b.    pensionable salary x (40/80) x 20?

This question goes to the heart of the PFT valuation issue. The rules for valuing Defined Benefit (DB) scheme benefits, as outlined by the Revenue Commissioners, are clear that the value is outlined under Option A above.

Some advisors have taken a different view of the legislation. In particular, the assumptions used under Schedule 23B suggest the value should be achieved on the basis of no reduction due to early retirement. This is the basis of the valuation under Option B above.

An alternative view is to value the existing benefit under Option A and to then provide a second valuation for future benefits. As this falls outside the formal valuation methodology suggested by Revenue, it provides more scope for an advisor to look at alternative valuations.

Aidan McLoughlin

Planning points after the Personal Fund Threshold applications. Part 1

Over the last few weeks we have been giving a pensions update to advisors at the joint LIA/ITI events. Some of the common queries that were consistently raised at the events revolved around the Personal Fund Threshold (PFT). Some of the queries raised are good examples for the basis of calculating a PFT.  I will be discussing some of these over the next few blog posts.

The first query put to me was; if you value a PFT on a gross basis and the asset is subsequently sold with the debt repaid, can you make further contributions up to the PFT level?

The allowance available under the PFT legislation is an extremely valuable asset.  Say you are granted a PFT for €3.3million, this equates to a €410k reduction in your tax bill.  Whilst the allowance is granted based on the value of assets held as at 7^th December 2010, there is no requirement that those assets should continue to be held.  Thus, by the time you retire, your Fund could comprise of entirely different assets.

For example, a property worth €3.3million on 7^th December 2010 could have €2million in debt attaching to it.  Whilst a PFT of €3.3million could be applied for, the actual Fund is, in practice, worth €1.3million.  If that asset is disposed of today and the debt is paid off, it becomes clear that the Fund is €2million below the PFT.  This can then be built up with further contributions. 

It should be noted that Revenue have recently issued a letter stating that in their view, PFTs should be valued on a net basis.  We are aware of a number of applications that proceeded on a gross basis and await, with interest, the outcome of those.

Aidan McLoughlin



Deadline for Personal Fund Threshold applications fast approaching

The deadline for applications for Personal Fund Thresholds (PFT) is now only one month away. June 7^th is the latest date that Revenue will accept applications for a PFT and to date less than 150 enquiries have been made to Revenue. It is estimated that over 6,000 individuals could be affected.

With the deadline fast approaching the key is planning; firstly to obtain the correct Personal Fund Threshold for your clients and secondly, to plan in order to minimise the impact of the threshold.  The traditional advice around pension planning may have to be adjusted based on your clients’ circumstances.

If you have a query regarding PFT you can contact our PFT Helpdesk on (01) 603 5199 or email pft@independent-trustee.com for an initial free assessment on your clients’ potential exposure.

Post Election Stress Buster

The Finance Bill 2011 reduced the Standard Fund Threshold for pensions to €2.3m but how does this affect clients on a practical level?

Let’s take an example of a client on a salary of €150,000 looking to retire in 10 years’ time with 2/3rds final salary.  This would mean an annual income in retirement of €100,000.  The value of this fund at retirement would be approx €3.4m. 

If the client already had a fund of this size on 7^th December 2010, he could apply for a Personal Fund Threshold and only amounts above the €3.4 would be subject to the additional tax of 41% at retirement.  This would mean that any future contributions or fund growth would be taxed at 41% on retirement in addition to the normal tax on withdrawals.  This could result in an overall effective rate of tax of 72%. 

Now assume that the client, who still has 10 years to retirement, hadn’t gotten to the €3.4m fund in December 2010, thinking that he still had 10 years to get there before he retired.  If his fund was valued at €2m on 7^th December 2010, he would not be entitled to apply for a Personal Fund Threshold.  If he continues to contribute and enjoy growth in his fund until he gets to a fund of €3.4m on retirement, he would suffer tax at an effective rate of 72% on all amounts above the €2.3m threshold. 

With the government having spent the last 10 years encouraging us all to make provisions for our retirement, they now appear to be undoing all of this.  Years of planning in good faith for retirement could now be punished by up to 72% tax.

And, according to the Fine Gael manifesto, this client may soon be facing tax on any excess above a €1.5 million fund threshold. Who knows what's in store with the new Programme for Government and what influence Labour may have had on Fine Gael's pre-election manifesto.

Jennie Faughnan