How secure do I want my pension to be?

Or perhaps it might be more correct to ask how secure do I want my pension vehicle to be? Pension holders, other than those in defined benefit schemes, are already carrying an investment risk, a risk that the performance of their pension may be less than they had projected.

But what about the security of the pension structure itself? What if I have my pension with an insurance company where my pension assets are held on that company’s balance sheet and that company gets into difficulty?

Of late we have been contacted by a number of advisors in relation to pooled funds and querying the ability of the person running a fund to invest in assets that were not in the original investment proposal for that fund. We have to say that this is very rare however it is getting aired in the media at the current moment in time because of controversy elsewhere.

Taking all the feedback we are getting it is clear that advisors see the security of pensions as a significant matter. Perhaps they are looking at the UK where the current thinking is that an advisor who does not consider the security of the pension vehicle when recommending a pension to his client can be deemed to be negligent.

So, what can ITC do about security of pensions? Well, for a start we can try to get the views of the industry on a more formal basis. In that regard we have already convened a discussion where we have invited people with a significant interest in this area to express their views.

We would also like the view of the industry in general.  We would really appreciate feedback on what you as an advisor would like to see in terms of pension security. For example:

• What way would you like to see pensions structured?
• Are there any specific measures that you think would make pensions more secure and help to promote confidence in the industry?

For our part we will collate the responses and report back to you.

We will utilise that feedback to ensure that we have the most secure pension structures possible.

So please, get emailing and let us know - we value your opinion!

 Sean McLoughlin 

Part 5: Standard v non-standard PRSAs

There are two types of PRSA – a Standard PRSA and a non-Standard PRSA. The main differences between them are the charges and investment options.

What is a Standard PRSA?

1.     A Standard PRSA has maximum charges of 5% on the contributions paid and 1% a year on the managed funds

2.    Apart from temporary cash holdings, these types of PRSAs can only be used to invest in pooled funds, also known as managed funds. These are typically internal linked funds of an insurance company or a collective investment scheme.

3.    A Standard PRSA may not be marketed or sold if purchasing it is conditional on also buying some other product, such as life assurance.

What is a non-Standard PRSA?

A non-Standard PRSA does not have a maximum limit on charges and allows investments in funds other than pooled funds. This is the great feature of non-standard PRSAs - the PRSA holder can potentially invest in anything he/she wishes subject to the Revenue investment rules.

A key thing to take note of is that the SORP for a non-standard PRSA must contain the following warning notice:

“It is recommended that you seek professional financial advice about the nature of this PRSA contract”

Conclusion

Simple differences but notably the non-standard offers a lot more flexibility in terms of investment choice.

Paul Gilmer

Part 4: Transfers - to and from a PRSA

One of the great benefits of the PRSA as a pension vehicle is its ability to interact with other pension products in terms of transfers. Here are some of the things it can do:

Occupational pensions

1.   Transfer to an occupational pension scheme is possible subject to the trustee’s consent.

2.  Can receive a transfer from an occupational pension scheme provided the period for which the individual has been a member of the scheme is 15 years or less and benefits have not become payable. The 15 year restriction does not apply to AVC transfers. Certificate of Comparison and Written Statement required.

Personal Pensions

3.   Can receive a transfer from a personal pension subject to the rules of the personal pension.

4.    A personal pension cannot receive a transfer from a PRSA.

Approved Retirement Funds

5.    At the point of retirement, a PRSA holder can elect to take their lump sum and transfer to an Approved Retirement Fund. However, once having elected to ARF, the client cannot transfer back to a PRSA.

Vested and Non-vested PRSAs

6.    A non-vested PRSA can move to another non-vested PRSA without any restrictions or charges being incurred.

7.    Revenue have recently confirmed that a vested PRSA can move to another vested PRSA.

Buyout Bonds

8.    Transfers from and to a buyout bond are not permitted.

International Pensions

9.    PRSAs have specific provisions facilitating transfers to or from pension schemes outside the State.

We will expand on some of the points above in later blogs in the series but what is clear from the above is that the PRSA is the ideal pension vehicle not only for its transferability but also as a vehicle for consolidation of a client’s domestic and international pension arrangements.

Paul Gilmer

Part 3: PRSA versus Personal Pension

The PRSA was conceived as a replacement for Personal Pensions. It was originally intended by the Pensions Board that following the launch of the PRSA in 2002, that Personal Pensions (RACs)  would be phased out. However it has not quite worked out like that, with the personal pension continuing to co-exist alongside the PRSA.

Much of the reason for the continued existence of the RACs  is down perhaps to the approach of the larger life companies who tend to not be fans of the more onerous disclosure requirements attaching to PRSAs.

That is a pity because the PRSA offers significant advantages over personal pensions. Let us look at some of these key advantages:

• Transfers - The PRSA can receive transfers from occupational pensions and can also transfer to an occupational pension. That is a huge plus compared to personal pensions which are quite restricted from a transfer perspective.
• Post Retirement - The PRSA can be used to both accumulate a pension fund and later to pay it out. There is no post retirement mode for RACs.
• Transfer Costs - By law there can be no transfer costs associated with a transfer of pension assets into or from a PRSA. However there may be transfer charges on transfers from a personal pension
• Preserved Benefits - Both PRSAs (prior to vesting) and RACs offer a preserved benefit which can go without deduction of tax to the estate of a pension holder on their demise.
• Beneficial Owner - The Pensions Act Sec 98(1) makes it clear that “a contributor to a PRSA shall be the beneficial owner of the PRSA assets of that PRSA”.  No such provision exists for personal pensions.

In conclusion when we look at the above it might be difficult to justify choosing a personal pension over a PRSA.

Sean McLoughlin