Independent Trustee Company Blog

Showing posts with label Capital Taxes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Capital Taxes. Show all posts

Thursday, October 3, 2013

Don't let the CAT relief out of the bag


There is, unfortunately, speculation that the forthcoming Budget will introduce yet another round of increases in the rates of capital taxes.  Not content with a 65% increase in rates from 20% to 33% since 2008, there is a fear that there will be both a further increase in the rates of Capital Acquisitions Tax (CAT) and Capital Gains Tax (CGT), a further reduction in the thresholds and the restriction of the remaining reliefs.

The CAT Rate
For a number of years up to 2008, CAT was charged at 20%.  In the last Budget it was increased to 33% from 30%.  Will it rise again?  Some commentators fear it will, particularly as the rate is still lower than UK inheritance tax at 40% and the rates in other EU jurisdictions. 

The CAT Thresholds
To many, a more important factor than the actual rates is the threshold at which CAT starts to bite.  In 2008 the parent-child Group A threshold was around €520,000 and the CAT rate was 20%.  Now the Group A threshold is €225,000.
So, not only is the rate higher, but it kicks in much earlier and so many more people are caught within its net.  Take the example of a child inheriting €600,000 in 2008 – the tax charge would have been around €16,000.  Now, the tax take would be about €123,000!
It could unfortunately get worse.

The CGT Rate
As with CAT, up to 2008, for a number of years, the principal CGT rate was 20% and now it is up to 33%.  Will it rise again?
Although it is currently not a huge concern for the majority of people, there is recognition that excessively high CGT rates could prove a disincentive to people to sell assets. There is, therefore, a possibility that the rates of CAT and CGT may differ in the future.
There is also a possibility that there could be tiered rates of CGT (and indeed CAT), e.g. CGT rates could be linked to different periods of ownership or level of gains.  There could, for example, also be a new lower CGT rate on the sale of business assets, which would be something to be welcomed. The National Recovery Plan of 2010 suggested some of these changes. 
 
The Reliefs
A further possible change is the restriction of the current CAT and CGT reliefs.  The Commission on Taxation in 2010 suggested restrictions on the reliefs available on transfers of family businesses. These have only been partially introduced, so perhaps they will be implemented more fully, which would further penalise the transfer of businesses to family members.  The National Recovery Plan also suggested a restriction of capital tax reliefs. There is, therefore, a distinct possibility that further changes could be on the way.     
If there is any chance that you or any of your clients are in the process of transferring a business or business asset in the near future, it would be worth doing so before the Budget.  For more information contact Barry Kennelly on barry.kennelly@independent-trustee.com.


Director, ITC Consulting

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Budget 2013 - Capital Taxes


As you know, Budget 2013 took place on December 6th 2012. In light of the upcoming Finance Act we continue our coverage on the main changes that took place. 

In line with previous Budgets, there were further changes in relation to capital taxes, which will have a significant impact on estate and succession planning. The headline changes were:
 
  • Increase in the Capital Acquisitions Tax (CAT) and Capital Gains Tax (CGT) rates to 33% from 30%. These changes were effective from 6th December 2012.  

  • A reduction in the CAT tax free thresholds by 10%. This change was also effective from 6th December 2012. The Group A threshold is now €225,000, the Group B threshold is €30,150 and the Group C threshold is €15,075.  

  • An increase in the rate of DIRT and exit tax from life assurance and investment fund products to 33% and 36%. This applied from 1st January 2013.  


It is worth remembering that around four years ago the Group A threshold was around €520,000 and the CAT rate was 20%. To illustrate the changes, using a simple example, if a child inherited an asset worth €600,000 in 2008, there would have been a CAT liability of around €16,000.  Under the new regime with the same facts, the CAT liability would be around €123,000.

There does not appear to be a change to the tax rate applicable on the transfer from an ARF to a child over 21. The 2012 Budget changed the applicable rate to match the CAT rate.  That may change in the Finance Act later this year.

Another change which may be of interest is contained in the summary of Budget measures which provides for a roll-over relief for agricultural property on disposal of farmland where the proceeds are re-invested in farmland to enable farm restructuring. This measure is subject to EU approval.

It was noticeable that there were no announcements restricting capital tax reliefs. It is to be hoped that the lack of mention means they will be left as is. However, it is possible that restrictions will be introduced in the Finance Act early this year. So, if there is any chance of you or a client undertaking the sale or transfer of a business or business asset in the near future, you should take advice to see if any potential changes in the upcoming Finance Act might affect your ability to rely on these valuable tax reliefs.    


Barry Kennelly
Associate Director
ITC Consulting

Monday, November 29, 2010

“Relief “ here today but gone …………

CAT 

Relief from gift/inheritance tax was generous in the tiger years, the tax-free thresholds available had increased significantly in acknowledgement of the increasing asset values. The intentions were clear at the time, so we shouldn’t be surprised that some (or many) of these measures will be reversed.

The sting in the tail of course will be that if, or when, we do see recovery in asset values in this country, we are unlikely to be in a position to access reliefs to the same degree again. While the 4-year plan doesn’t go into  detail, we can probably assume that the report of the Commission on Taxation, relegated to the bin shortly after publication, has been dusted off and will provide the inspiration for reforms. Taking that in account means that family businesses, including farming families, will pay a higher price when those assets are transferred. To put this in context, a family business worth €6m, which is gifted to three children could move from a minimum tax cost today of €60,000 to €810,000The plan itself seems to suggest that reforms will take place in 2012, but we can certainly assume that the tax-free thresholds will suffer a further decrease in January when adjusted for inflation (or rather, deflation.)

CGT
Charlie McCreevy reduced the capital gains tax rate to 20%, but did remove many of the reliefs available, really leaving the business related relief intact. This too will suffer, most likely with the imposition of a value cap on the benefit that can be derived from it. Many asset disposals in the coming years will be the subject of capital losses, rather than gains, and so it may be some time before changes in this area start to bite, although changes may be harsh depending on the levels at which differing rates of tax will apply.

Stamp Duty
Finally, to stamp duty, really the most regressive of them all, penalizing families trading-up or trading down in many circumstances. The reality is that the government rode the boom on this one, with stamp duties contributing €3bn to the economy in 2006 and 2007. Calls for reductions or abolition widely ignored, the government really did pander to (and continues to) the construction industry by ensuring that newly-constructed homes benefited from exemptions or reliefs to a far greater degree than second-hand, assisting the release of VAT into the system at the same time. Now everything is frozen, no stamp duty, no windfalls of VAT. There is no commitment to abolish this duty, rather a commitment to abolish the reliefs and exemptions that are currently available.

Is this government really, seriously, going to try to increase effective rates of stamp duty on significantly reduced levels of transactions? Stamp duty receipts in 2010 are 5% of what they were in 2007. Is there any understanding of the impact of this? Although maybe, just maybe, there is a shining light somewhere and the government is waiting to publish some good news in the upcoming budget.

It would appear that there may still be some time left to plan around some of these provisions. The only thing that’s certain is that we won’t know the full impact of changes for 2011 until December 7th.

For further commentary on the National Recovery Plan, see our website