Independent Trustee Company Blog

Showing posts with label DB scheme. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DB scheme. Show all posts

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Reprioritisation of Benefits: the real winner is…?


5 years into the financial crisis that destroyed the Balance Sheet of almost all DB schemes  (and 18 months after a comprehensive solution backed by IBEC, ICTU and certain pension bodies was presented to the Minister) action has finally been taken to restructure the Priority Order.

Why that is necessary can be illustrated by looking at a scheme with 2 members (1 pensioner, 1 active), an insolvent employer and a fund value of €500,000:

A. Before Financial Crisis
Value of Pensioner liability   €350k
Value of Active liability        €150k
Funding for Actives             100%

B. After Financial Crisis
Value of Pensioner liability   €500k
Value of Active liability        €150k
Funding for Actives              0%

The deterioration was primarily caused by the decline in bond yields in Germany which meant annuities became more expensive and therefore more of the fund was allocated to pay pensioner benefits.

The new rules now mean (in scenario b above) that where both the employer and pension scheme is insolvent (Double Insolvency) the balance will be rejigged as follows:

C. After Minister’s announcement
Value attributable to Pensioner    €425k
Value attributable to Active         €75k
Shortfall                                     €125k

Earlier this year the European Court of Justice ruled that the Irish State had failed to provide adequate protection to members of such schemes. The net effect of this was that, under scenario b above, the State was facing a liability of at least €75k. This liability will now be Nil – the pensioner is picking up the tab.

Note that in the recent budget the Minister for Finance also raised an additional levy on pension funds to pay for this liability –money he can now use for other purposes.


The real winner is the Government!

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

What is the Value of a Promise?


 
It is estimated that 90% of defined benefit schemes in Ireland are in deficit and that the pension schemes of 200,000 individuals are in danger of collapse with the new rules regarding funding requirements.  You will most likely see more of your clients coming to you asking what to do next.
The defined benefit scheme was the holy grail of pension schemes for a long time.  You were guaranteed a certain level of pension in retirement based on your years of service and salary.  What you effectively have is a promise and now you must ask yourself what value you can put on a promise from a scheme which is in deficit.  When advising clients who are considering exiting a defined benefit scheme, you must take particular care.  The client is considering giving up what could be a very valuable benefit, if the scheme can deliver on the promise.  However, if there are doubts as to the ability of the scheme to deliver or even survive, you would need to consider whether the client would be better off taking a transfer value now and putting those funds to work for them.

When an individual ceases employment or leaves a company pension scheme, or the company pension scheme is wound up, there are a number of options available to them.  Taking the transfer value to a buy out bond is becoming increasingly popular among clients.  The trustees of the existing company pension scheme will establish a buy out bond in the individual’s name and transfer the value of their benefits to the bond.  The aim is to put the individual in control of their pension benefits.  The buy out bond has fewer restrictions with regards to investments and often more favourable costs than a PRSA.  The buy out bond can also provide greater flexibility when accessing benefits. 

Independent Trustee Company has recently launched their new Buy Out Bond.  To find out more about  ITC’s BOB download our Brochure & Terms and Conditions.

Written by Jennie Faughnan
ITC Consulting

For further information contact our team to discuss:
Michael Keyes (01) 614 8045 / michael.keyes@independent-trustee.com
Sean Mc Loughlin (01) 614 9220 / sean.mcloughlin@independent-trustee.com
Martin Glennon (01) 603 5130 / martin.glennon@independent-trustee.com

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Fianna Fail Launches Pension Strategy Paper


The Fianna Fail pension strategy, launched today by Willie O’Dea, deals with several issues close to our heart:

1.       The funding requirements for DB schemes

2.       The priority order for DB schemes on wind up

3.       Early Access to Pensions and

4.       The issue of Pension Charges

As chair of the Pensions Committee of the IBA I have actively involved in communicating with politicians of all shades on the issues facing pensions. The paper launched by Willie O’Dea is testament to the fact that patient and consistent dialogue does have an impact.

The funding levels DB schemes have to met is set at artificially high levels due to:

1.       the historically low level of bond yields and

2.       the additional reserve requirement imposed by the current government

The Paper proposes that this be addressed by easing the funding requirements and allowing greater flexibility as to when and if annuities are purchased.

In relation to the priority order the Paper suggests that, once a certain level of pension has been guaranteed in priority to pensioners the balance should rank equally with other members of the scheme. This would address the big gap in benefit that can exist between members either side of retirement age.

The current early access regime is too restrictive (as it only applies to AVCS) and mean spirited (as it imposes an additional 41% tax on those in difficult financial circumstances). The solution proposed is to replace it with an option to take some or all of your tax free lump sum at any stage in your life. There is no loss of tax to government and the greater flexibility enhances the attractiveness of pensions and gives relief where it is due.

On pension charges the Paper proposes the development of a Total Expense Ratio so that fund manager costs can be more easily identified. Also greater transparency on other costs is advocated.
 
To view the full paper click here.

Written by Aidan McLoughlin
Independent Trustee Company
Managing Director