The quickening end to Defined Benefit Pension Arrangements
New
statutory requirements relating to funding defined benefit schemes have
recently become law with the coming into force on 1st May of the Social Welfare and Pensions Act 2012. The new rules set down will
inevitably lead to an increase in the wind-up of defined benefit pension structures.
This is due, among other things, to the new requirement for a “risk reserve” (additional
funding) to be set aside to act as a buffer against further economic turmoil.
These new measures are of course going to add further pressure on company
balance sheets and indeed we have already seen in the past week AIB and
Independent News and Media announce their intention to shut down their company
defined benefit schemes.
Defined
Benefit schemes have long been considered the Rolls Royce of pension structures
offering a guaranteed pension for life based on an employee’s final salary.
However, in recent years these pension schemes have been under severe pressure
due to volatile asset values and increasing liabilities which have been caused by
bad investment performance, low German bond yields and increasing life
expectancy. These issues coupled with a difficult business environment,
increasing taxation and regulation, and a poor economic outlook have caused employers
to consider restructuring their company pension arrangements. The new funding
rules introduced by the Social Welfare and Pensions Act 2012 will now force
employers to make decisions (as early as this December) they had been hoping to
avoid with such decisions having an immediate impact on company employees.
Take
an employee who has been a member of her company’s defined benefit pension for
the past fourteen years. She has been contributing 6% of her gross salary every
year of her employment with a matching contribution by the employer, but is
still sixteen years from her retirement age. Unbeknownst to her, much of the
contributions she has being paying in to the scheme have been used to pay the
pensions of the retiring employees of her company. Over the past 14 years, she
and her employer have each contributed approximately €42,000 to the scheme and she
believed that she had amassed a fund of €84,000+ allowing for investment growth
and charges. Her company have now decided to wind up the defined benefit scheme
and transfer her benefits to a defined contribution arrangement. It is at this
point she realises that not only does she have less in her pension than she
originally thought she actually has less than her own contributions. One of the
main reasons for this is the legislation governing defined benefits pensions
require the scheme trustees to give 100% priority to retired members so some of
the money she thought she was saving for herself actually went to people she’s
probably never met (unless she attends the company’s annual retirement do). In
essence her Rolls Royce benefit has become a clapped out banger.
So
what are a member employees options now and what can they expect from their
employer? All employers are required by law to ensure their company employees
have some access to a pension arrangement so it cannot be a case of walking
away from responsibilities. Companies will have to consider restructuring their
pension offering which will involve establishing some type of defined
contribution structure. Employers and employees are increasingly looking at other
pension arrangement options such as one member pension trusts or Personal Retirement Saving Accounts (PRSAs) to avoid the risks of underfunding and to bring some
sense of equity, fairness and transparency to their pension provision which
they do not perceive as being possible under the defined benefit structure.
These structures also allow an individual and employer to control the cost of
pension provision.
The realisation that defined benefit is not a guarantee of benefits at retirement will be an unwelcome message for most employees, but it is better they know now rather than at the point of retirement when their options are restricted. The financial implications of such changes to their pension arrangements will be specific to each employee. Some of the differences include different methods of calculating tax free cash lump sums, making individual investment decisions if the employee wants to and decisions on what can be done with their retirement fund at retirement, such as reinvesting in an Approved Retirement Fund (ARF) or deciding when or what type of pension to buy.
The realisation that defined benefit is not a guarantee of benefits at retirement will be an unwelcome message for most employees, but it is better they know now rather than at the point of retirement when their options are restricted. The financial implications of such changes to their pension arrangements will be specific to each employee. Some of the differences include different methods of calculating tax free cash lump sums, making individual investment decisions if the employee wants to and decisions on what can be done with their retirement fund at retirement, such as reinvesting in an Approved Retirement Fund (ARF) or deciding when or what type of pension to buy.
The
access to the ARF regime after retirement has been significantly widened
recently for members of defined contribution pension arrangements. The ARF option allows someone who has retired
to pass a capital sum to his or her family after their death. However, this
option is not available to retired members of defined benefit schemes. After retirement, the majority of members of
defined benefit schemes are limited to taking an annuity which can prove to be
expensive and inefficient for estate planning purposes.
The
switch of decision making and responsibility for funding to provide sufficient
benefits for employers to employees has been occurring gradually, but the new
funding rules for defined benefit pensions under the Social Welfare and
Pensions Act will accelerate the change. This presents an opportunity to create
flexible pension arrangements that will allow employers and employees fund for
their retirement while giving control of how these are funded and drawn down to
the employee.